Friday, September 7, 2012

#LiquorLeaks examines Clark's "liquor cabinet"


When Premier Christy Clark shuffled her cabinet on Sept. 5, she also refreshed her "liquor cabinet." 

Several cabinet ministers and MLAs are involved in one of the government’s biggest, most controversial priorities of 2012: to sell the warehousing and distribution operations of the Liquor Distribution Branch to a private operator. 

No business plan has been published by the government to justify the Feb. 21-announced breakup of LDB, which made a $911.1 million profit for government coffers on $2.89 billion of sales last year. 

Much has been written about Exel Logistics, which operates Alberta’s private since 1994 system and hired high-powered BC Liberal insiders Patrick Kinsella and Mark Jiles to lobby for the B.C. gig since 2005. No other company that submitted bids by the June 29 deadline has been as aggressive as Exel, which originally wanted to do a private-public partnership and skip a public tendering process altogether.

Clark is head of cabinet and, what I call, the liquor cabinet. Kinsella was co-chairman of her successful 2011 leadership campaign, a guest at her swearing-in on March 14, 2011 and a guest at the B.C. Place Suite for the Sept. 30, 2011 reopening of B.C. Place Stadium. Kinsella ended his lobbying registration for Exel on March 30, a month before the request for proposals was published.

Rich Coleman (upper right) is the minister responsible for the Liquor Distribution Branch and Liquor Control and Licensing Branch. His business card became more crowded in the shuffle with the designation of Deputy Premier. Coleman's name is mentioned in the Exel "Project Last Spike" internal memo: company vice-president Scott Lyons told his superiors that the company's relationship with Coleman could be used to influence the writing of the RFP. 

Mike de Jong (middle right) replaced the resigned Kevin Falcon as Finance Minister and was given the responsibility to “lead the work on the possible asset sale,” according to a Finance Ministry representative on condition of anonymity. De Jong was the waffling Attorney-General when Dave Basi and Bob Virk made surprise guilty pleas on Oct. 18, 2010 after the ex-Liberal ministerial aides accepted $6 million of taxpayers' money to pay their legal bills. A still-secret transaction that the Auditor-General John Doyle and intervenor/ex-Liberal MLA John van Dongen are seeking a court order to bring to daylight. (Hear more about the controversial sale of BC Rail to CN in The Investigators documentary here.)

Ben Stewart (lower right) replaced Margaret MacDiarmid as the Citizens’ Services Minister. Stewart is responsible for government-wide buying and contracting and it is the staff of his ministry who are handling the LDB tendering process. Three executives of the Coleman-overseen LDB (including acting general manager Roger Bissoondatt) and four executives from the Stewart-overseen Citizens' Services are on the evaluation committee, weighing the bids from four companies (Exel, ContainerWorld, Kuehne + Nagel and Metro Supply Chain Group).

“They will continue in their current roles in the procurement process,” said the Finance Ministry representative.

”Given Minister's Stewart's previous involvement in the industry, out of an abundance of caution and to ensure no perception of conflict, responsibility for this project was transferred to the Minister of Finance.”

Let’s not pussyfoot around the issue, eh? Stewart is both a client of B.C.’s LDB and Exel’s Alberta monopoly, Connect Logistics, through his family company Quails’ Gate Estate Winery of Kelowna. He was also lobbied by Lyons. Stewart advocates private distribution and said in the Legislature on May 7, the day before my story exposing Exel’s "Project Last Spike" broke and NDP critic Shane Simpson stood up in the Legislature during Question Period to demand answers from Coleman

Coincidentally, I spoke with Stewart on Sept. 4, the night before he was sworn into cabinet. (Stewart gave no hint about his imminent job promotion). Here's what he said about Exel's push to privatize: 

“We probably only have a very very tiny piece of the utilization of that, we've been working with LDB successfully almost 25 years and this new model is probably comparable a little bit to the Alberta model... 
“Sometimes it takes the initiative of some catalyst to make sometimes these things to happen. I think that Exel may have asked the question. Is the province willing to consider it. They knew that there was other competitors. There's people that house and store wine for imported wines and other products here int he province. The LDB doesn't have the capacity or the interest to be becoming a warehousing depot is what I think Exel is probably more their field of expertise.
“My only point of contact is I knew the distribution systems around the country and other parts of the world because of my background. That's the only reason I probably talked to Scott at any point and was supportive of the concept that if they thought they could do it better, we should look at an open process.” 

Stewart told me he had spoken with Lyons over a year ago. Lyons, we found out in July, had also spoken with Stewart’s brother, Tony Stewart. 

“I think Scott mentioned that he had met with my brother, my brother is responsible as CEO of our company to essentially maintain and do what's necessary to run our business.
“When I chose to go into politics I completely moved everything into a blind trust and have a friend that actually is the trustee, I have no contact at all with the winery. I don't know what my brother is doing in terms of whatever discussions. On a personal note we see each other for Christmas and family events, but it's not about the business. I have the trust in the trustee and him and the board of directors I put in place beforehand to make certain these things were done in a proper manner before I considered giving up a business that I'd spent 35 years creating.” 

Meanwhile, De Jong chairs Treasury Board, the 10-member committee that will approve the winning bidder in mid-October. Coleman and Stewart are also on Treasury Board. Same goes for Jobs and Tourism Minister Pat Bell, Ex-Finance Minister (and co-father of the Harmonized Sales Tax) Colin Hansen and John Les, who was liquor minister in 2005. Exel lobbyist Mark Jiles held several meetings with Les from 2005 to 2007, at which Les apparently expressed his encouragement. De Jong's vice-chair on Treasury Board is Justice Minister Shirley Bond, who was lobbied on Aug. 25, 2011 by Lyons in a meeting at the Premier's Vancouver Office and signed reports to Treasury Board and Cabinet supporting the Exel proposal to privatize LDB's logistics. Earlier that summer, Lyons had lobbied another Treasury Board member, Ida Chong, who helped connect Lyons with Tony Stewart. 




Political football as Liberals kick-off campaign

The Vancouver Whitecaps finally have their long-sought training nest.


.
The provincial government kicked in $14.5 million to the $32.5 million National Soccer Development Centre at the University of B.C.'s Thunderbird Park for a trio of natural grass pitches, a pair of synthetic turf fields and a field house. Another $3 million is on the table for future replacement of the artificial turf. It's near the Doug Mitchell Thunderbird Sports Centre, the white elephant of the 2010 Winter Olympics where few spectator events happen. The B.C. government paid about $19 million of the $47.8 million bill for the Games' secondary hockey venue. 

The soccer complex was originally earmarked for Delta and announced amid the last provincial election campaign on May 2, 2009 -- 10 days before the BC Liberals won another term. Premier Gordon Campbell had announced $17.5 million from the province towards a $31.5 million complex on 20-hectare John Oliver Park. 

But the attempt to buy the soccer vote near tony Tsawwassen got the yellow card from voters and municipal authorities. Liberal parachute candidate Wally Oppal lost on a recount to independent Vicki Huntingdon. By February 2010, Delta municipal council grew frustrated with the Whitecaps and nixed the project. 

Municipal land in Surrey and Burnaby was also eyed and the Whitecaps didn't endear themselves to those city halls. Enter UBC, which isn't a municipality (read: less bureaucracy) and happens to be in the Vancouver-Point Grey riding represented by Premier Christy Clark. Whitecaps' secretive and wealthy principal owner Greg Kerfoot is a personal friend of the premier. In seven donations since 2005, Kerfoot has given the BC Liberal party $36,790 via the Whitecaps and his company, Inspirit Group. 

Tech tycoon Kerfoot, a 1983 UBC computer science graduate, could afford to pay the whole bill himself for the training centre. Through a real estate agent, he was flogging this West Vancouver waterfront mansion on Stearman Beach for almost $10 million and seeking Vancouver city hall approval to build an office tower in downtown Vancouver at the southeast corner of Cordova and Granville. Back in 2005, the Whitecaps proposed using $60 million of Kerfoot's money to build an outdoor stadium north of Gastown. He already bought the land, worth $20 million. City council sent that hot potato to Port Metro Vancouver, where talks stalled for good. The Whitecaps eventually scored a sweetheart rent deal in the renovated B.C. Place Stadium. B.C. Pavilion Corporation refuses to tell me what, if anything, the Whitecaps pay for rent.  

The Sept. 6 announcement happened in Clark's riding, but the Premier was not there! Clark attended the annual Order of British Columbia awards ceremony at Government House in Victoria. Asked where she was in the afternoon, press secretary Mike Morton told me on Sept. 10 "the short answer is meetings." He suggested I make a Freedom of Information request for her agenda if I wanted to know more.  

Ex-sport minster Ida Chong stood-in for newcomer Bill Bennett for the first major spending announcement/re-announcement since Clark shuffled the cabinet a day earlier.  Burnaby MLA Richard Lee, North Vancouver MLA Jane Thornthwaite and Vancouver MLA Colin Hansen (Clark's 2011 by-election campaign chair) joined Whitecaps' president Bob Lenarduzzi for a photo opportunity with the UBC mascot. (Have the Whitecaps' mascot Spike and executive chairman John Furlong suddenly become camera-shy?)

The scheduling could have been a very clever tactic, to keep Premier Photo-Op away from cameras at what was the de facto kickoff of the fall 2012 phase of her 2013 re-election campaign (however futile it may be). 

Make no mistake, the joint government/Whitecaps/UBC news conference was to curry favour with a large portion of voters. Soccer is the biggest participatory team sport in B.C. The B.C. Soccer Association claims 100,000 youth players and 20,000 adult players, plus 2,000 registered referees. That's a lot families and their votes could mean a lot to the desperate-to-stay-in-power governing Liberals next May.

The Vancouver Whitecaps and the B.C. Liberals. Both mired in a slump.




Thursday, September 6, 2012

They never got to go home. We must never forget.


It wasn't like this on Sept. 5-6, 1972 at Connollystrasse 31, in the Munich 1972 Olympic Village.

This is where the world of sport forever changed. This is where Palestinian terrorists, calling their group Black September, took Israeli athletes and coaches hostage. The 11 innocents were eventually killed in what became known as the Munich Massacre.  

Perhaps the biggest tragedy was that the ugly incident was preventable. In fact, a psychologist advising Munich 1972 organizers, Dr. Georg Sieber, submitted a list of 26 potential security scenarios, according to Sports Illustrated's Aug. 26, 2002 edition. One of Sieber's scenarios came true.
The psychologist had submitted to organizers Situation 21, which comprised the following particulars: At 5:00 one morning, a dozen armed Palestinians would scale the perimeter fence of the Village. They would invade the building that housed the Israeli delegation, kill a hostage or two ("To enforce discipline," Sieber says today), then demand the release of prisoners held in Israeli jails and a plane to fly to some Arab capital. Even if the Palestinians failed to liberate their comrades, Sieber predicted, they would "turn the Games into a political demonstration" and would be "prepared to die.... On no account can they be expected to surrender."
Organizers wanted to have "Carefree Games" as they intended to welcome the world back to Germany. They were hoping to put behind them the ugly past of World War II. So Sieber's Scenario 21 was shelved. Denied. Ignored.
With security tossed aside, the Olympics became one big party. Mimes, jugglers, bands and Waldi, the dachshund mascot, gamboled through the Village, while uncredentialed interlopers slipped easily past its gates. After late-night runs to the HofbrÀuhaus, why would virile young athletes bother to detour to an official entrance when they could scale a chain-link fence only 6 1/2 feet high? The Olys learned to look the other way. A police inspector supervising security in the Village eventually cut back nighttime patrols because, as he put it, "at night nothing happens."
New information this year reveals that Neo-Nazis aided the terrorists and that German authorities were warned that something was going to happen. It never should have happened.
I was only two-years-old at the time. Since 2006, I have covered two Winter Olympics, two Summer Olympics, a Pan American Games and a Commonwealth Games. I have often criticized the apparent overwhelming spending waste on Olympic security. Security is absolutely necessary, but is absolute security necessary? How much is too much? I always wonder, if the fundamentals are followed, can the same goal of a safe and secure Games still be achieved for half the price? In 1972, German authorities simply didn't take care of Basic Security 101: The terrorists, wearing tracksuits, jumped a fence that was inadequately patrolled, along with bona fide athletes, including Canadians 
The incident unfolded before the eyes of the world and it came to a horrible conclusion.


ABC's Jim McKay delivered the grim news to viewers, in one of the most dramatic moments in sports broadcasting: "There were 11 hostages," he said. "Two were killed in their rooms, yesterday morning. Nine were killed at the airport, tonight. They're all gone."
Their names are still there. Inscribed on a plaque, in Hebrew and German, above "Ehre Ihrem Andenken" (Honor to their memory): David Berger, Seew Friedman, Josef Gutfreund, Elieser Halfin, Josef Romano, Amizur Shapira, Kehat Shorr, Mark Slavin, Andre Spitzer, Jaakow Springer, Mosche Weinberger. 
They went to Munich to compete in peace. They never got to go home. We must never forget. 

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

What now, #JesusLeaks? Crikey!


I'm taking a short break... a very short break... from the long-running, hit reality blog series called #LiquorLeaks and the new spinoff called #LotteryLeaks (I hear Deputy Premier Rich Coleman is a big fan -- not!) to bring you #JesusLeaks.

Yes, the B.C. Conservative Party is imploding under the leadership of John Cummins. The party failed to win either seat in last April's Chilliwack and Port Moody by-elections. It has been downhill ever since. Next May, will the Conservatives be a viable option to form the next Official Opposition (or be kingmakers in a minority scenario)? Or will the party simply be a vessel for a protest vote against the crumbling BC Liberals and little else?

Members are complaining that Cummins didn't do enough on the summertime barbeque season and isn't doing enough to support John van Dongen's noble (and costly) legal quest to unearth the truth about the BC Rail scandal and, especially, the $6 million deal that appeared to have induced surprise guilty please from Dave Basi and Bob Virk on Oct. 18, 2010.

Cummins is facing a leadership challenge. Some B.C. Tories want Cummins to be "goins" before October. 

The last straw for his opponents may have been Cummins' infamous quote in the Vancouver Sun comparing his plight to that of Jesus Christ. 
“I hate to use a biblical reference but Christ had 12 apostles and one turned him in,” Cummins said. “We share the same initials but I can’t rise from the dead and I can’t get unanimity on the board. I wouldn’t expect to be able to. He couldn’t. I can’t.”
While we wait for the ex-fisherman to drop a line about multiplying loaves and fishes or ponder his political resurrection, enjoy the latest Conservative internal communication provided to me by a source on Sept. 5:

Hello, BC Conservative Presidents: 
The feedback I’ve been getting from my address to the membership, this past week, has been positive in the fact that I have had a chance to clear up issues relating to party communication and administration that have been weighing heavy this past term. 
It seems as though there are issues affecting our party that many of you had wished the respect of knowing sooner, but were not privy to. 
Please let me clarify, too, that my intent on bringing to light party matters and the encouragement to vote yes in the leadership review, is that this party can ensure a strong success in the next general election. 
Although you may not be aware, it has been made public knowledge, that our party has limited funds and has weekend its ability to raise funds this term. In fact, last month our expenses were twice that of funds raised. With this in mind, in a vote that was not permitted to go to secret ballot at a board meeting, by our party president Reed Elley when asked for; and in contrast to our one MLA putting up his own money to fight the BC Rail case. John Cummins is now taking $4000.00 per month, plus his expenses, of the party’s limited resources, to add to his extremely high personal income, at a time when we need every resource possible to fight the next general election. With this in mind, we must ask ourselves what the motivation of the leadership of this party is when we have not seen, although we have gone through two by-elections, one workshop to train our volunteers in election readiness. When we had seen the growth of this party’s organisation develop, on an average rate at one Constituency Association (CA) every two weeks from 2010-2011, to a stagnant term where CAs have now resigned and dissolved. To the inability to provide in many instances a positive work environment, respect to volunteers, and a proper channel of communication to you our CA presidents and local representatives. 
The fact of the matter is that we will not be relevant in the next election, even in times like these, through a campaign of press releases and limited resources.
I hope this brings more clarification to recent statements.  
If there are other items I can clear up, you can give me a private call. 
Ben Besler
BC Conservative Party 
Vice President

Sunday, September 2, 2012

#LiquorLeaks salutes a New Champion (in name only)

Q: What's the easiest way to become a champion when it looks like you're the captain a losing team?

A: Go to an event where it's on the marquee and bring home the T-shirt!

Premier Christy Clark is returning to China, this time for the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2012 in Tianjin, China, to speak on a natural resources panel and host a wine-and-cheese party on Sept. 11.
There are two natural resources-related panels on Sept. 11 (The Future of Energy and The Future of the Resource Industry), but neither the speakers nor the times are listed on the program. The day's climax is a speech by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, whose Communist Party governs a country with an atrocious human rights record, where many of the citizens view the one-party, authoritarian state as a bullying force.

WEF in Tianjin is nicknamed "the Summer Davos" in reference to the Swiss town where the World Economic Forum meets every January. In 1992, NDP Premier Mike Harcourt and Finance Minister Glen Clark (the future premier who is unrelated to the current one), attended WEF in Davos. WEF even has a Centre for Public-Private Partnerships. Here is the WEF FAQ, which includes the following nutshell explanation for its activities:

"The World Economic Forum brings together leaders in business, politics and society for reflection and connection to generate ideas and proposals, bridging countries and cultures to address the issues affecting our world. We also bring the very best minds and experts to provide the necessary insight to allow leaders to make decisions that can bring about change for the better. Conferences like the Annual Meeting in Davos and regional summits are an occasion for leaders to outline major challenges and define strategies to address them.
WEF is not to be confused with the Bilderberg Group, which is cloaked in secrecy and does nothing to discourage millions of skeptics that reasonably wonder if executives of large corporations are lobbying invited government leaders behind closed-doors to change public policy and influence the awarding of contracts. You may remember Gordon Campbell attended the 2010 Bilderberg meeting in Spain during what was his last spring as Premier of B.C. The conclusions of the Conflict of Interest commissioner left many in B.C. shaking their heads.

But there are a few common elements. The WEF website's media guidelines say the Plenary Hall, Davos and Lugano rooms are open to press and on the record, one-on-one sessions are open on a reservation basis, but "all other sessions are off the record... members of the reporting press are not allowed in these sessions."

Some of the world's biggest corporations are involved as partners of the WEF. Participation in the WEF allows the 100 "strategic partners" to gain business intelligence and promote their goods and services to potential new customers, including governments. Or, as the WEF website says
"They believe in the power of multistakeholder interaction to drive positive change and work closely with the Forum to help shape the industry, regional and global agendas... Strategic Partners make a tangible impact on global issues and society by contributing to better policy-making, informing business decisions, sharing best practices and engaging stakeholders beyond commercial objectives."
In January 2011, the Sunlight Foundation blog noted how the annual WEF in Davos is a haven for high-powered lobbying. 
"Davos isn't just a place where the wealthy, influential, and powerful get together to swap ideas. It's also a place for the heads of business to lobby the most influential policy makers and regulators in a confined atmosphere."

Don't forget, the Tianjin version of WEF is called "the Summer Davos" by its promoters.

Some of the WEF partners are magnets for controversy:

Barclays, the British banking giant involved in the massive LIBOR interest rate-rigging scandal.
Goldman Sachs, called "Government Sachs" and "Premier Theme Park of Finance" by the New York Post
HSBC, under fire in the U.S. for allegedly helping launder billions of Mexican drug cartel dollars. 
Standard Chartered, which is in trouble for hiding billions of dollars of transactions with Iran.
Dow Chemical Co., which was criticized for sponsoring the London Olympics by the London Assembly. 

Clark will be familiar with WEF partner Accenture, which took over part of BC Hydro in a privatization deal brokered almost a decade ago by her 2011 BC Liberal leadership campaign backer and lobbyist Patrick Kinsella.

And then there's Deutsche Post DHL

Perhaps you've heard of them? This WEF partner is the German parent company of Liquor Distribution Branch suitor Exel Logistics and also the parent company of Giorgio Gori. Gori is an Italian company that has a tight business relationship with ContainerWorld that, according to Exel's own internal documents, includes an option to buy the giant Richmond warehouse. ContainerWorld is also seeking the LDB contract. Until March 30, Clark's queenmaker Kinsella was registered as a lobbyist for Exel.

Various arms of Deutsche Post DHL, including Exel, were involved in price-fixing cartels, but the European Commission didn't levy the company fines because it cooperated.

Deutsche Post DHL is the world’'s leading mail and logistics services group. The Deutsche Post and DHL corporate brands represent a one-of-a-kind portfolio of logistics (DHL) and communications (Deutsche Post) services. The group provides its customers with easy-to-use standardized products as well as innovative and tailored solutions ranging from dialog marketing to industrial supply chains. About 470,000 employees in more than 220 countries and territories form a global network focused on service, quality and sustainability. With programmes in the areas of climate protection, disaster relief and education, the group is committed to social responsibility. In 2011, Deutsche Post DHL generated revenues of 53 billion euros. The postal service for Germany. The logistics company for the world.
Don't be surprised if Deutsche Post DHL's big-wigs and heavy-hitters are in Tianjin at WEF on Sept. 11, coinciding with Clark's visit. The company announced in July an aggressive expansion in China and wants to derive a third of its business from China by 2017

Friday, August 31, 2012

#LiquorLeaks seeks more from Les

How’s this for a coincidence? 

Treasury Board is the 10-member cabinet committee that will receive the recommendation this fall from the joint Liquor Distribution Branch and Citizens’ Services Ministry committee deciding which private company will take over warehousing and hauling of liquor in B.C.

In the last week of August, no fewer than three members of Treasury Board announced they will not run for the ruling BC Liberals in the scheduled May 14, 2013 provincial election. Kevin Falcon quit as finance minister. Children and Family Development Minister Mary McNeil and John Les, Parliamentary Secretary to Premier Christy Clark, also said this was their last term in office. If Randy Hawes follows around Sept. 10, that would make four lame ducks on the committee that decides provincial spending, unless Clark makes wholesale changes with her next cabinet shuffle. The free enterprisers are fleeing the enterprise, with all signs pointing to a Liberal defeat and NDP victory. 

While Energy and Mines Minister Rich Coleman (below left) is the one currently holding the booze portfolio (and a seat on Treasury Board), Les (below right) was more involved in the early days of secret talks with Exel than he appears. Far more involved. 

From 2005 to 2007, in fact, then-unregistered lobbyist Mark Jiles met on several occasions with Les to promote the virtues of his $5,000-a-month client Exel. Les was a supporter of B.C. moving to an Alberta-style system. And it just so happened that the operator of the Alberta monopoly was a private company (and still is) called Connect Logistics, which is owned by Exel. 

Les played the role of a passive matchmaker, suggesting that Jiles and Rob Madore, the former Connect Logistics general manager, forge an alliance with the B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union. George Heyman was then president and Jeff Fox a director. Without workers agreeing to a private warehouser, nothing would happen.

Les was warm to the idea of Exel taking over, but opposed outright the privatization of LDB’s retail chain. LDB general manager Jay Chambers initially opposed selling off the logistics end of the business. Les was no fan of Chambers and thought it might be a good idea to replace him. Chambers stayed put until his surprising June 6 resignation, which was kept secret for eight days. 

When Chambers finally did an interview after joining the Motor Vehicle Sales Authority of B.C. in July, he claimed the career move was unrelated to the LDB privatization.

LDB privatization never really gained traction under former Premier Gordon Campbell. But when Christy Clark came to power in 2011, the game changed. The HST was defeated, the government was in a budget bind and it certainly didn't hurt Exel that its lobbyist Patrick Kinsella was Clark's key Liberal leadership campaign strategist.

What about Les? After numerous interview requests since May, he finally responded to me the day he announced his resignation. I know Les knows a lot about this file, but he doesn’t want to answer any questions. Following is our Aug. 30 email exchange. 

From: Bob Mackin  10:19 AM 
To: Les.MLA, John; Les, John 
Subject: media request 
Hello Mr. Les,
Would you be available for an interview today or tomorrow to discuss your time on the LDB file, particularly 2005 to 2007 when you were being lobbied by Mark Jiles on behalf of Exel? I know that you met regularly with Mr. Jiles on this matter during that period of time. 
Sincerely,
Bob Mackin
Business in Vancouver

From: Les, John
Date: August 30, 2012 10:20:30 AM PDT
To: Bob Mackin
Subject: RE: media request 
No, sorry. The current Ministers responsible speak for government on this issue.

From: Bob Mackin
Sent: August-30-12 10:23 AM
To: Les, John
Subject: Re: media request 
Thank-you for the reply, but the questions I have are specific to your time on the file and those questions are ones that only you would be able to answer. 
From: Les, John
Date: August 30, 2012 10:30:51 AM PDT
To: Bob Mackin
Subject: RE: media request 
Sorry. Same answer.
By the way, a delegation from Exel toured the LDB’s headquarters and warehouse on Wednesday with Citizens’ Services official Pelle Agerup and fairness monitor George Macauley. LDB provided me lists of attendees of the May 9 industry information meeting, the May 10 proponents' meeting and tours of the Kamloops LDB warehouse. Citizens' Services provided the list of bureaucrats who decided the shortlist of four and are deciding the recommendation to Treasury Board. Citizens' Services, however, wants to keep the list of the Aug. 29 Exel tour group secret, citing a laughable wish to guard the "integrity" of the process.

Remember, folks, this is a process in which no business plan has been published. It is a process that appears to be driven by the Liberal-connected lobbyists for a unit of one of the world's largest corporations. A process in which the leading bidder speculated internally that it could use its connection to the minister responsible to influence the writing of the request for proposals in its favour or buy-out a related competitor to achieve the same outcome. It is a process that the NDP has likened to the scandalous BC Rail privatization of 2003. 

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Launching #LotteryLeaks

You could call it the motherlode.

It's not often that I receive more than 500 pages of documents via Freedom of Information. But here 'tis.

A compilation of several records from the files of the Gaming Policy and Enforcement Branch, the British Columbia government's regulator of gambling.

Highlights:

Page 3: Investigations of the Lake Country Winfield and District Minor Hockey Association and Comox Valley Raiders Youth Football for unlicensed raffle ticket draws.

Page 28: Allegations of illegal lottery ticket resales by Telco Management (aka CW Agencies) in Vancouver.

Page 138: Prize payment violation by a Fort St. John retailer.

Page 153: Surveillance of a Surrey retailer.

Page 177: Marijuana dealing to teenagers at the Cascades Casino in Langley.

Page 184: Sting operations in Prince George to catch sellers of lottery tickets to minors.

Page 446: Sting operations in Quesnel to catch sellers of lottery tickets to minors.

Page 485: Allegations of selling lottery tickets to minors in Nanaimo.

Page 503: Selling a used Scratch & Win ticket in Pemberton.

As always, I'm sharpening my FOI pencil. I also welcome credible, verifiable information from good sources via email or in unaddressed, brown envelopes to me, c/o Business in Vancouver (102 E. 4th Ave., Vancouver, B.C. V5T 1G2) and The Tyee (P.O. Box 88484, Vancouver, B.C. V6A 4A7).

Gambling crime investigation files

Thursday, August 23, 2012

#LiquorLeaks - Jay and the 8-Day Delay


On June 4, general manager Jay Chambers sent a memo to staff, assuring them he would guide them through the process that is the privatization of the Liquor Distribution Branch's non-retail functions.

He also invited staff to send him questions and even had a dedicated email address, askjay@ldb.com

LDB, through its parent, the Ministry of Energy and Mines (Rich Coleman, minister), shared modified versions of two of the emails with me via Freedom of Information, plus the prepared response. Were there more emails? Who sent them?

Ten days after Chambers invited questions from staff, he announced his resignation to join the Motor Vehicle Sales Authority of B.C. The sudden and inconvenient June 14 announcement had all the appearances of getting out of the kitchen while the privatization pot was burning. Predictably, both Coleman and Chambers claimed otherwise: Nothing to see here, move along. NDP critic Shane Simpson didn't buy it and unsuccessfully attempted to have the privatization's so-called fairness monitor, George Macauley, halt the tendering process. Macauley's power is extremely limited. He's a monitor, not a referee.

I don't buy it either. Chambers had a conference call on April 12 with the MVSA's hired headhunter George Madden, on LDB company time. It's in Chambers's daily LDB agenda!

Here's the kicker. Chambers told Coleman's deputy minister Lori Wanamaker on June 6 that he was resigning! That's eight days before the June 14 memo! Why the eight-day delay in telling staff?

"It is with very mixed emotions that I have made this decision," Chambers wrote to Wanamaker, giving her a month's notice. See the letter below.

Chambers's last day of work was July 4. He left two days early with an afternoon office party at the LDB headquarters. Roger Bissoondatt took over in the interim and is leading the committee vetting bids to take over LDB's warehousing and logistics.

Jay Chambers' resignation letter

Ask Jay FOI

Saturday, July 21, 2012

#LiquorLeaks has more questions than answers



There is no longer a six-pack of companies seeking to privatize liquor warehousing and distribution in British Columbia.

Four bidders were shortlisted July 20: Exel, ContainerWorld, Kuehne+Nagel and Metro Supply Chain Group. It was supposed to be a list of three, but there apparently was a third-place tie in the merit points rankings. The rankings were not released. 

Schenker and Hillebrand Westlink didn't make the cut.

Read my story in Business in Vancouver here. I asked a Schenker executive if he felt the process was fair. He said it was "very straightforward," but refused to say whether it was fair.

Listen to Minister Margaret MacDiarmid's teleconference above. She was peddling the usual government line about the importance of the role of the fairness monitor, George Macauley. NDP critic Shane Simpson found in June that Macauley is really powerless. He is not a referee, but an observer. Big difference.

You'll hear me questioning MacDiarmid about whether Exel and ContainerWorld are really bidding independently and whether the government is doing anything to ensure that is so. I tried to get her "off-message," to get a real answer. Not political spin. It was obvious that she came better-prepared to handle an agitator after being embarrassed July 12 by Vaughn Palmer's grilling, which you can hear here.

I still have so many questions for Minister MacDiarmid, such as: 

Why is the government delaying my Freedom of Information request on the list of times and dates that the six bidders submitted their formal proposals? Your ministry is stewarding the Distribution of Liquor Project bid process, but the disclosure has been delayed until Sept. 27 so that Energy and Mines can be consulted. You're also the minister of open government. Is your ministry really in charge of this process, or are you part of an elaborate communications strategy to deflect attention from liquor minister Rich Coleman, who has never been made available for me to interview? In Exel's own words, it pondered using its relationship with Mr. Coleman to influence the writing of the request for proposals.

Why did Mr. Coleman tell CKNW's Simi Sara in a Tweet on July 19 that bids closed June 30? The request for proposals states very clearly that the deadline was June 29 at 4 p.m. Did Mr. Coleman mis-speak or were the rules bent for any applicants? Kindly provide me the list of date(s) and time(s) that the formal bids were received (see above). 

Your ministry has released the transcript of the May 10 bidders' meeting. It has not released a transcript of the May 9 industry information meeting. Why? Is it because several industry stakeholders asked questions and were of the opinion that LDB privatization would harm the industry and raise costs? I was there and I posted a recording of the question and answer session. Listen here.

Again, I ask, what assurances does your ministry have that no bidders are working in collusion? I have evidence in Exel's own words, in its Oct. 6, 2009 "Project Last Spike" internal memo that says an alliance with or an acquisition of ContainerWorld was among Exel's strategies to become the warehouser and distributor. Exel's sister company Giorgio Gori has a longstanding business relationship with ContainerWorld and an option to buy the Richmond warehouse. ContainerWorld owner Dennis Chrismas met with Mr. Coleman on March 2. Has anyone from ContainerWorld met with anyone involved with Exel, directly or indirectly, since the RFP was published? 


Mr. Chrismas has not responded to my phone calls or emails. 

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

#LiquorLeaks wonders: is B.C.'s open government a sham?

I have used this space before to comment on Premier Christy Clark's open government sham, er plan. Excuse me.

I didn't think the Distribution of Liquor Project could get more suspicious, but the BC Liberals must not have been paying attention to public and media discourse. I made a very simple Freedom of Information request to find out exactly when the six bidders on the long list submitted their bids.

It's not the first I've made. Here is a previous post about how I found out LDB and the government are hiding cost/benefit analyses and business case reports regarding privatization. I have since appealed to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner.

On this latest request, the government initially told me I'd get a response by Aug. 15. Now it has notified me that it is delaying disclosure until as late as Sept. 27 because it feels like consulting with another public body. It has the power to invoke further delays. Sometimes the information is so sensitive, that the government can make a valid case to delay disclosure. Most of the time the government is motivated to withhold records, either temporarily or permanently, for fear of embarrassment.

Minister Margaret MacDiarmid -- whose portfolio includes Open Government -- told me on July 9 that it was her ministry that was managing the privatization bidding process. Citizens' Services is in charge of government buying and contracting and Citizens' Services was in charge of receiving the formal bids by the 4 p.m., June 29 deadline.

MacDiarmid's staff now tell me they want to consult with the Liquor Distribution Branch and Energy and Mines. LDB answers directly to Energy and Mines and its minister, Rich Coleman. See the letter below.

The shortlist, which could be as little as one bidder or as many as three, is supposed to be announced July 20. (We know a lot about Exel, but how much do you know about ContainerWorld, the only B.C. bidder which has an interesting relationship with an Exel sister company? And what about Schenker and Kuehne + Nagel and their previous relationship with Exel in the European Union?)

Why does the government want to hide the time(s) and date(s) that the bidders submitted their documents?

If all six bidders did respond on-time, as per the rules, shouldn't the proof be made public now?

Laughable Delay & Bother



Blog Archive